Pages: [1] 2 |
1. The Mining profession. It's a waste of time. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Yeah, mining is pointless. The game evolved a completly different way than I assume the CCP devs planned. Being a miner or in a miner corp is putting yourself at a disadvantage in any PvP encounter, for something that makes less money than almost ...
- by Centri Sixx - at 2011.04.02 19:32:00
|
2. Mineral Content of High Sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Yeah, EVE is a PvP game, so then why can't mining ships at least defend themselves in PvP? Why is the PvE side so defenseless? You want them in lowsec, okay, but at least boost their buffer and give them non-strip miner utility slots so they can ...
- by Centri Sixx - at 2011.03.30 06:23:00
|
3. Mr Economist (Eyjog?) @ fanfest - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Centri Sixx on 26/03/2011 19:12:58 Akita T, we do NOT need to encourage suicide ganking, but for a different reason. It inhibits people's desire to PvP by reinforcing the passivity of the victim. You wont increase suicide ganking th...
- by Centri Sixx - at 2011.03.26 19:12:00
|
4. Keep Agent Quality - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'm confused what this will accomplish. Will it be a nerf to hisec missioning due to population, or buff because now all agents have a higher level of overall quality and you have fewer noncombat missions? Will it increase PvP due to area competit...
- by Centri Sixx - at 2011.03.26 03:49:00
|
5. Gamasutra article on EVE-the next steps. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Gamasutra has just published an interview with one of the devs here. Some nice little tidbits from a designer's perspective, like how they are monitoring PI because it allowed 0.0 alliances to get richer since they no longer needed to buy fuel f...
- by Centri Sixx - at 2011.03.24 18:36:00
|
6. Fix losec. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
They did mission in PvP fits though, and ones that even require a large enough amount of members to dissuade lone pirates. It's called incursion, and it hasn't really drawn that many to lowsec that weren't already there. The thing about the "lows...
- by Centri Sixx - at 2011.03.23 18:09:00
|
7. Why do people want to change low sec? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It's easier to evade with FW SBs than get caught, spank. It's really easy if you just pay attention: gated missions and fast align give a lot more time to react than in a belt, and they sure can survive the infrequent gate camps better than other ...
- by Centri Sixx - at 2011.03.20 23:56:00
|
8. [evenews24.com] iskbank.com exposed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Othran Edited by: Othran on 14/03/2011 18:28:50 Originally by: Centri Sixx I'm thinking because it's widespread enough that banning the bots and RMT would cause a lot of economic distress. The problem is that EV...
- by Centri Sixx - at 2011.03.14 18:46:00
|
9. [evenews24.com] iskbank.com exposed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tippia Originally by: Whitehound So why do you so desperately need to see thousands of players banned from the when you do not have proof of their guilt? Strawman argument. No-one is saying that. Why is breaking t...
- by Centri Sixx - at 2011.03.14 18:11:00
|
10. Who did you vote for? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I voted for none, because I'd like to see the CSM disbanded. The money and time wasted on them could be allocated better, and there's no reason CSM duties couldn't be done via email or forum.
- by Centri Sixx - at 2011.03.12 22:00:00
|
11. Why aren't there new players? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
You have them, but after two or three months they run into the EVE hump, when you progress slows, and you just log on to do the same thing every day and train your skills. Whether its a weekly mining op, or roam, or wardec, the game doesn't change...
- by Centri Sixx - at 2011.03.12 00:54:00
|
12. [evenews24.com] iskbank.com exposed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
People are assuming the information matches and isn't being used for political gain. CCP can verify it but don't assume its that easy to do, considering the massive volume of transactions going on in EVE each day. Generally the specificity of deta...
- by Centri Sixx - at 2011.03.10 18:30:00
|
13. Incursion : the elitist snobbery of EVE - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I don't think we'd have this issue if virtually all the content wasn't based around logi/bc+bs. Frig and Cruiser based content along with this would give something to do for the lower sp players as well as a place where you don't have to be so ser...
- by Centri Sixx - at 2011.03.06 13:35:00
|
14. the past 7 High Sec incursions spawned have been in Amarr space :( WTF - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This is always a problem with statistics for me. If you have a 50% chance, it doesn't mean you will go 1 incursion in amarr, one outside, in any sort of pattern. It just means over time, 50% of incursions will have happened there, as more and more...
- by Centri Sixx - at 2011.03.05 17:52:00
|
15. Would this increase pvp? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The only way this would work is if you made ships had a combat mode: upon aggression, it takes a predetermined time for the ship to go into warp, and you replaced always on scramblers and disruptors with ones with a cooldown, so a smart pvper ould...
- by Centri Sixx - at 2011.03.04 14:04:00
|
16. Getting kills shouldn't be hard, but time consuming... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Problem with the above is in one breath you say "Eve PvP is all about inflicting the pain, is cat and mouse, is not supposed to be fair," and in the next you ***** about carebears leaving corps when you wardec them, no one in lowsec, and all 0.0 b...
- by Centri Sixx - at 2011.03.04 04:39:00
|
17. Just say NO to the new forums - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Change the like button to a "gank" button. If 10 are reached, current ship of the poster is blown up. Instant fix to the economy and civility, all in one. Much more in the spirit of EVE.
- by Centri Sixx - at 2011.03.01 12:26:00
|
18. Helicity Boson - 'duhhhhh... what's irony? Durrrrrr' - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Problem with this is that you are making events where the only correct choice for half the particpants is to leave. It's just pointless. It puts a bad face on PvP in the game, it isn't fun even for the gankers, and it is not getting people into Pv...
- by Centri Sixx - at 2011.02.21 17:00:00
|
19. "a battleship is not meant to be a solo pwnmobile" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The point of a solo player isn't pwning, it's surviving and being free to do what you like in a game where most people need a fleet of thirty ships to go to the bathroom.
- by Centri Sixx - at 2011.02.20 02:45:00
|
20. Gettin Bored.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
From the posts, it would be insulting carebears and destroying their ships, as well as insulting rival alliances and destroying their ships. Plus recycling annoying memes and *****ing about whatever CCP decides to add to the game. The actual gamep...
- by Centri Sixx - at 2011.02.19 17:15:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |